Search This Blog

Thursday, February 5, 2015

That Works!

What a great idea for that "actin' a fool" kid in your world.

Cuttin’ Up: Atlanta-Area Barber Will Give Old-Man Haircuts to Misbehaving Kids

Russell Fredrick, owner of A-1 Kutz, says the idea came to him after his 12-year-old-son’s grades dropped and he gave him a humiliating haircut as punishment. 
Posted: 
 
3e1f885ca0eafa2ea6647167b932f2d3c38c5836
The Benjamin Button Special  FACEBOOK
The Benjamin Button Special.
That’s what you ask for if you have a son who is misbehaving and don’t happen to live too far from A-1 Kutz barbershop in Snelville, Ga. Three days a week, owner Russell Fredrick and his band of barbers will cut your mischievous boy’s hair in such a way as to make him look like a tiny George Jefferson.
That's right, according to the Washington Post, for kids who want to “act grown,” the shop offers the reverse-aging haircut three days a week—essentially shaving the top of the child’s head and leaving the sides full—as a hands-off form of punishment, for free.
Fredrick, 34, and a father of three, told the Post that the idea grew after he hooked up his 12-year-old son, Rushawn, whose grades had dropped dramatically, with a fresh Benjamin Button Special. Well, guess what? After that, Fredrick says, his son’s grades “dramatically skyrocketed.”
So far, Fredrick says, one mom has taken him up on the offer, bringing her son in for the punishing cut, but he adds that after pictures of the haircut hit social media, interest in the senior-citizen coiffure increased.  
“There are a few people that are saying it’s emotional abuse,” Fredrick told the Post. “But on average, everyone is applauding the mother that brought the child in—and applauding me as well.”
Read more at the Washington Post.  

“You Know Damn Good and Well Why It Took So Long . . . "

Dick Gregory receives a star on the Walk of Fame.

http://variety.com/2015/film/features/dick-gregory-receives-a-star-on-the-walk-of-fame-1201421388/

My Guilty Pleasure

Empire is my guilty pleasure.  It's worth watching for Cookie alone.  

From The Daily Beast - 


Why ‘Empire’ Gets Bigger Every Week

No TV series in 20 years has grown in popularity as quickly as Empire has. How black voices, the changing industry, and Cookie—gotta love Cookie—contribute to its stunning reign.
Cookie is the greatest character to have slithered across our TV screens in a very long time. Might we say ever?
It’s the way Taraji P. Henson spits her toxic one-liners. It’s the mama bear devotion to her gay baby cub. It’s those fabulous, absolutely hideous clothes. And that name! Her name is Cookie!
That Cookie exists at all might be the most unexpected development of this season. She’s unlike anything we’ve seen before on network TV. The show she steals, Empire, is also unlike anything we’ve seen before: a crazy-sexy-cool concoction that’s part My Three Sons, part King Lear, some Glee, a lot of Dynasty, and a little Hustle & Flow.
Even the way Empire has taken over the zeitgeist is unlike anything we’ve seen before. Or at least in a very long time.
Fox’s musical soap opera stars Terrence Howard as music mogul named Lucious, whose rise from the streets to a record company’s corner office left emotional waste to his three sons. The oldest Andre, (Trai Byers), is a bipolar, ruthless corporate solider; Jamal (Jussie Smollett) is a gay musical prodigy spurned by his father’s homophobia; and the youngest, Hakeem (Bryshere Gray), is a little shit—a rapping Justin Bieber whose spoiled upbringing and absentee parents fueled his petulance and his mommy issues. Then there’s mommy herself, Cookie, who has just been released from jail and is back to get what’s hers: a piece of Lucious’s fortune, control of her children, and, apparently, New York’s most expansive cheetah print wardrobe.
The show is total nonsense. It’s also endlessly fun, captivating, and, thanks to the tragic emotional core of Jamal’s coming out story, surprisingly moving. As a TV success story, its rise has been unparalleled. There have been countless thinkpieces attempting to parse out why, but the answer is actually quite simple: it’s big, black, and beautiful—in every glorious, celebratory sense of those three words.
Empire is an unprecedented series in an unprecedented moment for diversity in television. It was a monster hit out of the gate, surpassing ABC’s How to Get Away With Murder as the year’s top-rated new show among viewers under 50. But the show is even bigger than that. Unlike Murder and other recent freshman hits, ratings for Empire went up in its second outing…and then up even more for its third episode. That’s unheard of.
On one end of that is the cheap entertainment that comes anytime Cookie storms into a room, chucks a shoe at someone, or hisses one of her catty one-liners.
According to Vulture, it’s been 20 years since any drama grew like that among viewers under 50. The last time it happened when you factor in all audiences was a decade ago when Grey’s Anatomybuilt its numbers in each of its first four episodes. Heard of that show?
What’s more, Nielsen reports that it was seen in 33 percent of African-American households, which is just an astounding number. (That’s five times as many as the week’s No. 2 show.)
But Empire’s success story is not a demographic-specific one, or a “black” success story. Its blockbuster build in ratings over the course of its first three airings dispel any notion that this is a “black” show for a “black” audience, an antiquated idea that TV shows need to be targeted to marginalized audiences and that—groaningly—“mainstream” (white) audiences wouldn’t embrace stories that reflect the lives of other cultures.
The week-to-week build means that Empire is a blanket hit, across all demographics. When viewed as part of a trend in TV this year, it becomes all the more clear that the entire idea of “black” shows or culture-specific shows must be banished. What we’re seeing instead is the mainstream embracing of diversity, of which Empire is but the latest example.
It’s telling that the three breakout hits this TV season—How to Get Away With Murderblack-ish, and now Empire—are shows featuring black leads and from black creators or executive producers. These are shows getting plum time slots, enthusiastic marketing pushes, and a strong message from the networks producing them: they deserve a big audience, of every color.
Empire builds on the discovery that ScandalGrey’s Anatomy, and How to Get Away With Murder maestro Shonda Rhimes eureka’d a long time ago. It’s far more interesting to tell stories about characters who are each 50 shades of good and evil and sexy and abhorrent and heroic and brave and despicable and strong and weak. And it’s far more interesting when everybody is allowed that full spectrum of behavior.
On Rhimes’s shows, and now on Empire, megalomaniacs and scorned lovers and bitches in heels aren’t caricatures. They’re characters with nuance and without judgment. And they’re, finally, of every color and sexual orientation, too.
These shows, and the rabid fanbases they’ve earned, prove that there’s payoff in adventurous, even insane storytelling.
Empire is a show that, with a straight face, names its two lead characters Lucious and Cookie. Its melodrama is so Shakespearean that the pilot even cops to its cribbing of King Lear. It’s high camp when it wants it to be and brutally real when it needs to be, explaining how the cartoonish ferocity of Cookie and the upsettingly honest narrative revolving around Jamal and homophobia in hip-hop can co-exist on the same show.
And if every tonal yin in Empire has its yang, then Henson and Howard are on-screen soulmates.
Looking at Hustle & Flow and Empire as bookends of their Hollywood careers thus far, you see why they need each other. He’s the safe space that makes her comfortable enough to growl out such a guttural, raw performance. And she’s the necessary presence to dirty up the fraudulent, insufferable preciousness that suffocates most of Terrence Howard’s work. The relationship is even played for a little self-aware “art imitating life” plotting on Empire. It’s only when Cookie saunters into a room that Lucious drops the act, gets gritty, and is himself, which is to say finally likable.
But one of the major tenets of Empire’s success is how addictive it is. That this audience is so large, growing, and committed to watching each episode in real-time is huge. Nobody watches live TV anymore. And let’s be completely honest: there are dozens of TV programs that are better than Empire. So what is it about this show that’s hooked people so voraciously when those higher quality programs haven’t been able to?
For one, it’s faux-baity, in that it’s chockfull of headline-grabbing nonsense rife for web listicles of “Empire’s Most Shocking Moments.” On one end of that is the cheap entertainment that comes anytime Cookie storms into a room, chucks a shoe at someone, or hisses one of her catty one-liners. On the other end is the highbrow-lowbrow mix of moments like the rant calling Obama a sellout and, of course, the blow job bib. (A blow job bib? You learn something new every day.)
But the brilliance of Empire is all the ways that it’s not courting controversy for the mere, shameless sake of gaining attention or drumming up eyeballs and tweets. It’s confident in its narrative and its ability to carry our attention. This is in contrast to, say, the relentlessness of the ad campaigns for How to Get Away With Murder, which teases each successive episodes with #OMG hashtags that specifically draw attention to the show’s most glaringly baity moments.
The experience of discovering and obsessing over Empire is a rare one these days. We haven’t been bribed into watching by promises of nine words you just won’t believe. (Ahem: “Why is your penis on a dead girl’s phone?”) We haven’t been bullied into sampling it by critics.
Empire’s reign has been a victory for old-school word of mouth. It was never an obvious hit. If I’m being totally candid, it never seemed like something I would ever watch or enjoy. And I have a feeling that I’m not the only person who’s come on board to the show who felt that way.
It’s no small potatoes that, along with Danny Strong, one of Empire’s creators is Lee Daniels (PreciousThe Butler), who is probably the most visible black filmmaker besides Tyler Perry. And here he is on television, where Perry has long made a second home, telling a story that viewers, judging by the ratings, have clearly been craving. Hot on his heels making the transition to the small screen is Selma director Ava DuVernay, who just announced a television deal with Oprah Winfrey for OWN.
Even a fool could look at the rise of diversity in television and the rise in quality of diverse programming and see a connection to the recent #OscarsSoWhite scandal, including the egregious snub of DuVernay herself for Best Director at the Academy Awards. Audiences are craving stories about the full spectrum of human experiences, and creators from all points on that spectrum are eager to tell those stories. So these voices are going where they can be heard. They’re going to TV.
Because here’s the bottom line: Audiences want more Cookie. Give us more Cookie. Cookie is the best.

Heartwarming

This little boy had a stroke in vitro and was born with all kinds of medical challenges, but watch how he responds to his dad singing/rapping to him.

http://www.people.com/article/disabled-boy-father-raps-wheelchair-reaction?xid=rss-fullcontent&from_app=ios&ref_=ext_iost_

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

Smart Kids

These youngsters won national recognition for building a prize winning app.

Bravo!

http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2015/02/_we_can_t_sit_back_and_watch_history_we_ve_got_to_create_it.html?wpisrc=newsletter_jcr%3Acontent%26


Full Body Scans Data

Hat/tip Forrest.

FULL BODY SCANS   AT AIRPORTS: 

CATSA disclosed the following Airport Screening Results
December 2013 Statistics On Airport Full Body Screening From CATSA :
Terrorists Discovered
      0
Hernias
1,485
Hemorrhoid Cases
3,172
Enlarged Prostates
8,249
Breast Implants
59,350
Natural Blondes
3
It was also discovered that 308 politicians had no balls.

Thought you'd like to know.

10 Rules of Survival

From The Root



Get Home Safely: 10 Rules of Survival from SALT Project on Vimeo.


10 Rules of Survival if Stopped by the Police

1. Be polite and respectful when stopped by the police. Keep your mouth closed.

2. Remember that your goal is to get home safely. If you feel that your rights have been violated, you and your parents have the right to file a formal complaint with your local police jurisdiction.

3. Don’t, under any circumstance, get into an argument with the police.

4. Always remember that anything you say or do can be used against you in court.

5. Keep your hands in plain sight and make sure the police can see your hands at all times.

6. Avoid physical contact with the police. No sudden movements, and keep hands out of your pockets.

7. Do not run, even if you are afraid of the police.

8. Even if you believe that you are innocent, do not resist arrest.

9. Don’t make any statements about the incident until you are able to meet with a lawyer or public defender.

10. Stay calm and remain in control. Watch your words, body language and emotions.

A Phenomenal Woman

After trying unsuccessfully to embed this video, please refer to the link below to see a clip a true pioneer in every sense of the phrase.

It is entitled "The Queen  of Code."

Please check it out and pass it on, especially to folks with little girls in their world.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-queen-of-code/

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

The Mystery of the Floating Feet

Fifteen feet have turned on the shores of Seattle and surrounding areas.  It is a mystery who they belong to and solving it is proving to be no easy task.

http://www.psmag.com/nature-and-technology/pacific-northwest-foot-missing-persons-mystery

Sunday, February 1, 2015

Donating Poop

For medicinal use.
For real.
From The Huffington Post

Donating Poop Can Help Save A Sh*tload Of Lives

You may want to sit down for this.

While there’s no shortage of stories of gracious people giving blood and donating organs, a new nonprofit is encouraging people to hand over their No. 2’s to help those with plaguing gastrointestinal conditions.

After watching a friend and relative with C. difficile infection, an aggressive intestinal bug, suffer through 18 months of ineffective treatments, a small group of microbiologists, public health advocates and concerned citizens founded OpenBiome in 2012.

The concerned founders felt heartened when their loved one was able to recover after getting a fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), aka a poop transplant, and they wanted to make it easier for other patients to get access to the life-changing procedure, according to the group’s website.


 

C. difficile attacks the lining of the intestines and can lead to constant diarrhea and severe abdominal pain, among other issues, according to WebMD. It affects about 500,000 people in the U.S. every year and can be fatal in extreme cases, according to OpenBiome. About 14,000 to 30,000 people succumb to the condition annually.

While introducing healthy fecal matter is relatively simple -- since it can be done via endoscopy, nasal tubes or swallowed capsules -- obtaining rigorously screened, healthy poop was incredibly challenging before OpenBiome hit the scene, The Washington Post reported. So desperate for a reprieve, many patients resorted to conducting at-home transplants, which can pose serious risks without proper medical supervision, according to the nonprofit.

The Medford, Massachusetts group has streamlined the process by exhaustively screening potential donors and then sending the filtered, frozen and ready-to-use fecal matter to hospitals and clinics around the country.

What used to take clinicians about two to three hours to conduct, now can be completed in 20 to 30 minutes.

As of December, OpenBiome had shipped more than 1,500 treatments of stool to 150 hospitals and clinics in 36 states.

And viable donors (you have to be between 18 and 50 and have a BMI less than 30) are compensated pretty handsomely.

Prospective donors get $40 for a sample, and accepted donors can earn up to $250 a week (that’s $13,000 a year).

"We get most of our donors to come in three or four times a week, which is pretty awesome," co-founder Mark Smith told The Post. "You're usually helping three or four patients out with each sample, and we keep track of that and let you know." 

While the group doesn’t currently have the bandwidth to correspond directly with patients, it’s doing its part to help people who can’t afford the procedure.

In the last six months, OpenBiome has sent 45 pro bono treatments, which included helping a homeless veteran who was being treated at a VA hospital, Carolyn Edelstein, an OpenBiome employee, told HuffPost via email.

The vet had recurring episodes of C. difficile and his social worker reached out to the organization for help.

"She had expected to have to negotiate hard against a more traditional pharmaceutical organization for a discount, and was very glad we had the program," Edelstein said.  "The procedure went well, and he's since recovered."

Another View

Of the Iraqi War from another sniper.

This is from Salon.


I was an American sniper, and Chris Kyle’s war was not my war 

Don’t make the mistake of thinking the hit movie captures the truth of the Iraq conflict. I should know. I lived it 


I was an American sniper, and Chris Kyle’s war was not my warA photo of the author 
I spent nights in Iraq lying prone and looking through a 12-power sniper scope. You only see a limited view between the reticles. That’s why it’s necessary to keep both eyes open. This way you have some ability to track targets and establish 360 degrees of awareness. I rotated with my spotter and an additional security team member to maintain vigilance and see the whole battlefield. I scrutinized every target in my scope to determine if they were a threat.
In a way, it’s an analogy for keeping the whole Iraq mission in perspective and fully understanding the experiences of the U.S. war fighters during Operation Iraqi Freedom. No single service member has the monopoly on the war narrative. It will change depending on where you serve, when you were there, what your role was, and a few thousand other random elements.
For the past 10 days, “American Sniper” has rallied crowds and broken box office records, but if you want to understand the war, the film is like peering into a sniper scope — it offers a very limited view.
The movie tells the story of Navy SEAL sniper Chris Kyle, said to have 160 confirmed kills, which would make him the most lethal American military member in history. He first shared his story in a memoir, which became the basis for Clint Eastwood’s film adaptation. Kyle views the occupation of Iraq as necessary to stop terrorists from coming to the mainland and attacking the U.S.; he sees the Iraqis as “savages” and attacks any critical thought about the overall mission and the military’s ability to accomplish it.
This portrayal is not unrealistic. My unit had plenty of soldiers who thought like that. When you are sacrificing so much, it’s tempting to believe so strongly in the “noble cause,” a belief that gets hardened by the fatigue of multiple tours and whatever is going on at home. But viewing the war only through his eyes gives us too narrow a frame.
During my combat tour I never saw the Iraqis as “savages.” They were a friendly culture who believed in hospitality, and were sometimes positive to a fault. The people are proud of their history, education system and national identity. I have listened to children share old-soul wisdom, and I have watched adults laugh and play with the naiveté of schoolboys. I met some incredible Iraqis during and after my deployment, and it is shameful to know that the movie has furthered ignorance that might put them in danger.

Unlike Chris Kyle, who claimed his PTSD came from the inability to save more service members, most of the damage to my mental health was what I call “moral injury,” which is becoming a popular term in many veteran circles.
As a sniper I was not usually the victim of a traumatic event, but the perpetrator of violence and death. My actions in combat would have been more acceptable to me if I could cloak myself in the belief that the whole mission was for a greater good. Instead, I watched as the purpose of the mission slowly unraveled.
I served in Iraq from 2004 to 2005. During that time, we started to realize there were no weapons of mass destruction, the 9/11 commission report determined that Iraq was not involved in the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, false sovereignty was given to Iraq by Paul Bremer, the atrocities at Abu Ghraib were exposed, and the Battle of Fallujah was waged.
The destruction I took part in suddenly intersected with news that our reasons for waging war were untrue. The despicable conduct of those at Abu Ghraib was made more unforgivable by the honorable interactions I had with Iraqi civilians, and, together, it fueled the post-traumatic stress I struggle with today.
My war was completely different than Chris Kyle’s war. That doesn’t mean his war is wrong, and mine was right. But it does mean that no one experience is definitive.
The movie depicts compounded action scenes with very little political and regional context. It was a conscious decision by Clint Eastwood, apparently, to leave out the cause of the U.S. invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq. It was a conscious decision, apparently, for multiple characters to describe the Iraqis as “savages” and never show any alternative. When I heard of the bigoted reaction some Americans had after watching the film, I was disgusted, but not surprised. Audience members are mistaking Chris Kyle’s view of the war as “the” story about the war. No wonder someone tweeted that the movie made them “want to go kill some ragheads.” It’s sad that such a nearsighted portrayal of Iraqis has caused more people to fear Arabs and glorify violence against them.
It would be refreshing if a big Hollywood movie would take on the task of creating a less dramatized, more nuanced version of warfare. There are some incredible documentaries on the subject. “Occupation: Dreamland” and “Restrepo” capture the life of a service member in a modern deployment without sugarcoating the hard political environment that is a backdrop to the conflicts.
The responsibility to make a picture that takes into account all of the political and social dynamics might not rest on any individual filmmaker. After all, it is just a movie. But that means the public should treat it like that, and educate themselves before jumping to a conclusion that the whole war was just like that. Especially if they support the democratic ideals that Chis Kyle, me and every veteran who put on a uniform swore an oath to defend with our lives.
If you really want to be a patriotic American, keep both eyes open and maintain 360 degrees of awareness. Don’t simply watch “American Sniper.” Read other sources, watch other films about the conflict. Talk to as many veterans as you can, get a full perspective on the war experience and the consequences. Ensure the perceived enemy in your vision is what it seems.
Garett Reppenhagen served as a Cavalry Scout Sniper with the 1st Infantry Division in the US Army and deployed on a peacekeeping mission in Kosovo and a combat tour in the Diyala Province, Iraq in 2004. Garett works as a Regional Director for Vet Voice Foundation and is a veterans advocate and social justice organizer.

Only in Texas

Lawn Mower Racing.

No, really.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/behold/2015/01/30/jennifer_boomer_photographs_lawn_mower_races_in_texas.html

Stanford Prison Experiment

This is a chilling account of an experiment conducted on Stanford's campus that shows what happens when ordinary folks (students) are asked to pretend to be either prisoners or prison guards.  

It got real ugly real quick.

Check out the complete experiment at http://www.prisonexp.org.  An excerpt is below.

Also note, a movie is being made that debuted at the Sundance Film Festival recently.

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/jan/30/sundance-2015-review-the-stanford-prison-experiment


A Simulation Study of the Psychology of Imprisonment Conducted at Stanford University

Welcome to the Stanford Prison Experiment web site, which features an extensive slide show and information about this classic psychology experiment, including parallels with the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib. What happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph? These are some of the questions we posed in this dramatic simulation of prison life conducted in the summer of 1971 at Stanford University.

How we went about testing these questions and what we found may astound you. Our planned two-week investigation into the psychology of prison life had to be ended prematurely after only six days because of what the situation was doing to the college students who participated. In only a few days, our guards became sadistic and our prisoners became depressed and showed signs of extreme stress. Please join me on a slide tour describing this experiment and uncovering what it tells us about the nature of human nature.

Saturday, January 31, 2015

Coming Soon

A camera case that is a photo printer.

Awesome Idea!

http://cameras.reviewed.com/news/this-case-turns-your-phone-into-an-instant-photo-printer?utm_source=usat&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=collab

He's Asking All the Right Questions, But . . .

Is anyone listening?

Another Richard Sherman article.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/features/2015-01-30/the-nfl-s-trashtalker-of-truth

Friday, January 30, 2015

Entire Movie Shot on iPhone 5S Camera

Pretty amazing!

http://www.theverge.com/2015/1/28/7925023/sundance-film-festival-2015-tangerine-iphone-5s

Making Sense of It

I'm thrilled to share there's another grand baby on the way!  And it's another girl! How cool is that?

After an overdose of testosterone growing up and raising boys, I get the ribbons and bows!

Woohoo!

Of course, the downside of being a long distance grandma is that I'm so far away, that I don't get the pleasure of seeing my girls grow up in an up close personal way.

But here's what I'm hoping . . .

That somehow, when they're older, they'll see my life as an inspiration, and not as some foolish old lady on an extended trip overseas.

I hope they will have the courage to step out of their comfort zone and do exciting things.

I hope they will learn to appreciate the world, and the varied cultures in it, with their different ideas and different ways of doing things.

I hope they'll see that you're never too old to pursue your dreams.

I hope they will be fearless (not as I am, but as I strive to be), always questioning, asking why?

I hope they will understand their value and their worth, not only to themselves, but to the world.

I hope they will forgive my absences, as I strive to pave a way for them.

Anyway, that's how I'm making sense of this . . .

My being away.

Here's hoping they will understand this.

Here's hoping they will care.

Thursday, January 29, 2015

Smart Kid From the Hood

Richard Sherman, football player for the Seattle Seahawks.

You love him or hate him.

There's no in between.

He was raised in Compton, and graduated from Stanford with a 3.9 GPA.

These images speak volumes.


 





Street Names Matter. Who Knew?

Check out this insightful article in the New York Times on how street names impact home values.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/01/29/sunday-review/road-map-home-values-street-names.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=c-column-top-span-region&region=c-column-top-span-region&WT.nav=c-column-top-span-region

Too Hard?

Some of the loudest voices in sports media have had a lot to say about Josh Gordon.

Were they too hard on him, or not hard enough?

Here is his well-spoken response.

https://medium.com/the-cauldron/an-open-letter-to-charles-barkley-co-cb5c4e64cf3